Adaptive Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under Diverse User Behavior
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Adaptive Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under Diverse User Behavior
Abstract:Off-policy evaluation (OPE) of ranking policies is challenging be- cause selecting and ordering multiple items from a candidate set makes the number of possible rankings grow combinatorially with the number of candidates and the ranking length. Consequently, Inverse Propensity Scoring (IPS), whose importance weight is the full-ranking probability ratio under the evaluation and logging policies, can have excessive variance. Independent IPS (IIPS) and Reward Interaction IPS (RIPS) reduce variance by imposing fixed assumptions on how users browse rankings, but may introduce bias when those assumptions mismatch actual behavior. Adaptive Inverse Propensity Scoring (AIPS) addresses this trade-off by adap- tively marginalizing importance weights over the actions that affect each position-wise reward. It attains minimum variance within a class of unbiased IPS-based estimators when the true user be- havior model is observed. However, its estimation accuracy may still degrade for longer rankings, and AIPS does not use a reward model for residual correction. We propose Adaptive Doubly Robust (ADR), which combines adaptive importance weighting with re- ward regression through a control-variate correction. We establish its unbiasedness when the true user behavior model is observed and characterize a sufficient condition under which it reduces vari- ance relative to AIPS. Across synthetic experiments with 10,000 simulations per condition, ADR improves mean squared error over AIPS and conventional ranking OPE estimators across a range of logged-data sizes and ranking lengths.
| Comments: | 14 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables. Accepted at CONSEQUENCES 2026 and selected for oral presentation |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.29600 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.29600v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29600
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Fundamental Dynamical Units for Physics-Informed Structural Inference from Perturbation Time-Series in Networked Systems
Sep 14
-
Physics-Informed Conformal Prediction: Embedding PDE Consistency into Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operators
Sep 14
-
Fed-Equilibrium Framework for Topological Pareto Control in Robust and Fair Clinical Federated Learning
Sep 14
-
Efficient AI Model Deployment Using Quantization Analysis Tool
Sep 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.