Honest Physical-Support Inference after Latent Dictionary Learning: Collision Singularities and Minimax Resolution
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Honest Physical-Support Inference after Latent Dictionary Learning: Collision Singularities and Minimax Resolution
Abstract:Sparse-support uncertainty is usually quantified by treating the dictionary as known, an assumption that can produce overconfident, label-dependent conclusions when the dictionary is learned from latent sparse mixtures. Near collisions of coherent atoms, a test signal may identify the active physical group even though the training data cannot distinguish the physical rays within it.
We develop inference for active physical rays, unit atoms modulo sign, after latent dictionary learning. In a fixed-dimensional Gaussian train-test experiment, we retain all dictionaries compatible with a robust training-moment region, profile the test representation over them, and project surviving configurations onto a permutation-invariant support space. The resulting confidence correspondence can report cross-sheet inconclusiveness, group resolution with child ambiguity, or fine-support resolution.
We characterize both its statistical cost and decision-theoretic benefit. Residual block orientation first affects the latent training density at cubic order, yielding information of order $s^6$, where $s$ is the within-block collision scale. The correspondence provides high-probability-over-training conditional test coverage, with resolution governed separately by parent detectability, test-time support separation, and learned-dictionary orientation. In the resolved fixed-shell regime, its projective Hausdorff diameter contracts at the minimax-optimal rate $s \wedge (\sqrt{N}s^2)^{-1}$, up to constants. A restricted-task theorem further determines when coefficient asymmetry allows test replication to supplement training information and when calibration uncertainty remains irreducible. The framework thus yields honest, resolution-adaptive support statements and guides the allocation of training versus test measurements.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.16813 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.16813v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16813
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Learning Discrete Riemannian Metrics for Physical Fields with Cochain-Frame Equivarianc
Aug 18
-
Forward Pass Domain Adaptation (Without Cross-Layer Backpropagation)
Aug 18
-
Coarse-to-Fine Multi-Resolution Diffusion Models for Trajectory Generation in Urban Systems
Aug 18
-
Geometry Is Not Robustness: A Trajectory-Level Study of PGD Evaluation
Aug 18
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.