From Context Shift to Stylistic Collapse: Why Training Objectives Matter More Than Scale
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:From Context Shift to Stylistic Collapse: Why Training Objectives Matter More Than Scale
Abstract:In modern LLMs, linguistic features function not as stylistic artifacts but as probes of probability mass, allocated under training alignment objectives. Language models trained with contemporary pipelines exhibit severe reshaping of linguistic features, leading to extreme language re-distribution. While previous stylometric analyses explored linguistic differences between AI-generated and human texts, we focus on the reshaping plaguing the LLM training pipeline itself. We analyze 17 models (410M-100B+ parameters) across 24 linguistically-motivated probes, documenting that instruction-tuned systems systematically collapse language entropy along discourse and structural dimensions (mean amplification: 1,949-16,853%, peaks: 5,181-209,675%), while selectively suppressing complex punctuation to 3.2-23.2% of baseline frequencies. These effects do not worsen under RLHF, as divergence patterns are statistically indistinguishable (p > 0.25) across matched base and instruction-tuned model pairs. Weak intervention (lambda=1.0) exacerbates collapse by 240%, while strong control (lambda=5.0) achieves 40.5% improvement and outperforms frontier models by 96.7-98.2% despite 200-1000x scale disadvantage. Additionally, lambda=5.0 delivers 15% higher distinct-4, 27% higher vocabulary diversity, and 78% lower repetition than moderate regularization, establishing that alignment requires sufficient control strength, not merely distributional smoothing. Our findings underscore how modern LLMs reallocate stylistic probability mass, despite RLHF and scale. More broadly, our work reveals a structural limitation of current alignment pipelines: preference optimization reshapes language distributions invisible to standard quality metrics yet detectable through distributional probes, with implications for AI detection, training data contamination, and long-term linguistic evolution.
| Comments: | 26 pages, 13 tables, 2 figures. Planning to submit to NeurIPS 2026 |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.28826 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.28826v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28826
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Lightweight Multimodal LLM-Enabled Cost-Effective Defect Grading of Power Transmission Equipment
May 29
-
What are They Thinking? Delineation, Probing and Tracking of Concepts in LLMs
May 29
-
A Modular Architecture for Typologically Controlled Lexicon Generation
May 29
-
MechELK: A Mechanistic Interpretability Framework for Eliciting Latent Knowledge in Large Language Models
May 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.