arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Shape-Based Inductive Bias for Glioma Grading from Tumor Contours

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2607.26090 (eess)
[Submitted on 27 Jul 2026]

Title:Shape-Based Inductive Bias for Glioma Grading from Tumor Contours

View a PDF of the paper titled Shape-Based Inductive Bias for Glioma Grading from Tumor Contours, by Puneet Velidi and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Glioma grading from tumor contours is often treated as a pixel problem even when the signal of interest is shape. We align closed contours with a functional shape-alignment framework, separate global deformation from residual Fourier shape, and organize these quantities as frequency-ordered tokens. In five-fold patient-disjoint cross-validation on BraTS~2020 tumor contours, with model selection performed using grouped inner validation, a compact multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieves the highest mean balanced accuracy at 71.5\%, compared with 65.9\% for ResNet-18 and 63.3\% for ViT-Tiny. It also gives the highest mean low-grade glioma F1 at 54.9\%. Its pooled out-of-fold balanced accuracy is 72.4\% (patient-bootstrap 95\% CI: 66.4--77.8\%). The selected MLPs use 2.9k--117.3k parameters across folds, at least 46 times fewer than the pixel baselines. In a controlled noise-free simulation, shape-based models reach 56.3--71.5\% balanced accuracy while the pixel models remain at 50.0--52.5\%. This work demonstrates how incorporating a shape-based inductive bias at the representation level can improve interpretability and scalability while enabling substantial dimensionality reduction.
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.26090 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2607.26090v1 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26090
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Cédric Beaulac [view email]
[v1] Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:11:50 UTC (763 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning