arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

HindsightBench: A Black-Box Behavioral Audit Protocol for Parametric Hindsight in Time-Indexed LLM Decision Tasks

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.18867 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Jul 2026]

Title:HindsightBench: A Black-Box Behavioral Audit Protocol for Parametric Hindsight in Time-Indexed LLM Decision Tasks

Authors:Haozhe Jia
View a PDF of the paper titled HindsightBench: A Black-Box Behavioral Audit Protocol for Parametric Hindsight in Time-Indexed LLM Decision Tasks, by Haozhe Jia
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models leak parametric knowledge of realized outcomes into historical financial decision tasks. Existence is settled; what users lack is a cheap way to audit a given model for it. We present HindsightBench, a black-box behavioral audit protocol that profiles parametric hindsight in any time-indexed LLM decision task at probe-level cost (no backtests, no logprobs, no corpus access). The protocol chains a four-arm date-manipulation matrix (revealed/date-only/masked/transplanted), dual memory probes (date recovery; outcome recall), and six per-model metrics -- trigger strength, transplant effect, post-cutoff placebo, recoverability, behaviorally effective knowledge cutoff, and a recall-accuracy dissociation coefficient -- with explicit gates where identifiability is data-dependent. Applying it to 15 models from seven vendors on a 258-node vintage-correct macro panel yields three headline patterns: (i) the date-trigger reflex tracks training generation, not scale -- absent across the 2024 open-weight generation from 1B to 70B, present in every tested 2026-generation model, and switching on within one vendor lineage (Qwen3 -> Qwen3.6) at fixed MoE architecture and 3B active parameters; (ii) effective cutoffs span 22 months across vendors and precede vendor-reported dates by up to eight months, invalidating calendar-window placebo designs; (iii) audit results are not invariant to serving -- BF16 serving of an FP8-referenced model breaks the trigger estimate's stability while AWQ-INT4 preserves it, and a provider-locked reasoning regime makes one probe non-convergent -- so the protocol ships with operational requirements (pin quantization and thinking regime; disclose parser and sampling policy). We release the panel, frozen preregistrations, per-model audit rows with measured dollar costs, transcripts, and one-command regeneration.
Comments: 15 pages, 3 figures. Code, panel, and per-model audit rows: this https URL (v1.0 release archived at doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21453191)
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.18867 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.18867v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18867
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Haozhe Jia [view email]
[v1] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:58:36 UTC (850 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled HindsightBench: A Black-Box Behavioral Audit Protocol for Parametric Hindsight in Time-Indexed LLM Decision Tasks, by Haozhe Jia
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning