arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Rethinking Length-Based Training: Batch Composition and Loss Normalization in Speech Token Language Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.25890 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]

Title:Rethinking Length-Based Training: Batch Composition and Loss Normalization in Speech Token Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Rethinking Length-Based Training: Batch Composition and Loss Normalization in Speech Token Language Models, by Hongjin Song and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Short-to-long training is a simple curriculum for speech models, but its gains can be difficult to interpret. In speech token language models, length-based training can change the shuffle policy, batch composition, token retention, and token weights under batch-mean loss. We disentangle these factors through matched comparisons. In the tested settings, short-to-long ordering shows no independent benefit when batch composition and token exposure are fixed. First-epoch grouping lowers perplexity for Mimi under batch-mean loss, but this gain is not observed under token-balanced loss. The cross-tokenizer results are consistent with a link between chunk-length variation and token weighting. This work provides a systematic analysis protocol for studying length-based training in variable-length speech models.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.25890 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.25890v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25890
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hongjin Song [view email]
[v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:56:01 UTC (69 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Rethinking Length-Based Training: Batch Composition and Loss Normalization in Speech Token Language Models, by Hongjin Song and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language