Agent-based models for the evolution of morphological alternation patterns
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Agent-based models for the evolution of morphological alternation patterns
Abstract:Why is the past of English "go" the apparently unrelated "went"? Such alternations are frequent in languages. They neither aid communication nor learnability, yet they can be persistent, surviving over centuries or millennia.
We present a multi-agent simulation of the emergence of morphological stem and inflection alternations. Alternate forms arise by phonological changes or, as with "go/went", from lexical alternatives associated with a subset of the population. When an agent 'hears' another agent use a novel form for a slot in the paradigm of a word (say, the past tense of go), they will with some probability adopt that form, possibly spreading its use to other slots in the paradigm that shared the same original form. Thus alternative forms can spread through the population and become entrenched as stem or inflectional marker alternants. Unlike many previous computational studies, our system allows for naturalistic lexical forms, realistic phonological rules, lexicons with hundreds or thousands of entries, and agent populations in the tens or hundreds. It supports several network topologies, diffusion patterns and agent adoption policies.
One issue with such simulations is evaluation: how realistic is the resulting morphology compared to those of real languages? We introduce the AI Historical Linguist, a novel Large Language Model-driven system that models a debate between two historical linguists. We use this to compare a set of real language morphologies, disguised morphologies, and experimentally evolved morphologies. The results suggest that among the factors that favor more plausible morphologies are scale-free social networks and random Bernoulli adoption of forms.
We also present three case studies modeling attested historical changes, allowing us to test what might have happened if history had been different.
All code and data are released.
| Comments: | 51 + 37 pages. 31 Figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.12748 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.12748v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12748
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
EDEN: A Large-Scale Corpus of Clinical Notes for Italian
Jun 12
-
Helping Figures Tell their Story! Paper-Grounded Video Generation Explaining Complex Scientific Figures
Jun 12
-
MARD: Mirror-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Mechanism-Level Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction
Jun 12
-
Constrained Semantic Decompression in LLMs through Persian Proverb-Conditioned Story Generation
Jun 12
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.