Mean-to-Score Discrete Diffusion: Posterior-Mean Denoisers for Score Entropy
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Mean-to-Score Discrete Diffusion: Posterior-Mean Denoisers for Score Entropy
Abstract:Score Entropy Discrete Diffusion (SEDD) parameterizes discrete reverse processes with unconstrained positive score ratios. While positivity guarantees nonnegative reverse jump rates, it does not ensure Bayes realizability: ratios at a noisy state need not be jointly induced by any clean-token posterior under the forward kernel. The score-entropy loss has the correct population optimum but does not enforce this constraint away from it. In a trained pure-uniform SEDD checkpoint, roughly one quarter of complete score vectors violate the coordinate box, while more than half lie inside it yet remain materially incompatible with any valid posterior. Such violations can produce negative pre-normalization weights in finite-step sampling. Projecting raw scores onto the bridge polytope removes all observed negative weights and improves external generative PPL from $203.6$ to $175.1$ without changing the sampler. We introduce \emph{mean-to-score} (M2S), which predicts a clean-token posterior mean and converts it to the score through an exact kernel-dependent linear map. The construction applies to any known coordinate-wise continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) satisfying a mild support condition. For uniform corruption, it maps the probability simplex onto the bridge polytope; for absorbing-mask corruption, the resulting objective recovers MD4 exactly. In a controlled 28.4M-parameter CIFAR-10 comparison, M2S lowers test BPD from $3.173$ to $3.129$ and FID-50k from $\CifarSEDDFID$ to $\CifarMtwoSFID$. A 170M-parameter M2S model trained on about 262B OpenWebText token slots outperforms the evaluated pure-uniform SEDD, GIDD, and Neural CTMC checkpoints at every tested sampling budget, reaching generative PPL $143.3$ at 128 steps versus $183.6$ for the strongest pure-uniform baseline.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.21372 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.21372v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21372
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Application of Artificial Intelligence for Fraudulent Banking Operations Recognition
Aug 11
-
Data-Driven Fire-Zone Segmentation for Improved Short-Term Wildfire Prediction
Aug 11
-
Evolving Safety Landscape of Multi-modal Large Language Models: A Survey of Emerging Threats and Safeguards
Aug 11
-
Tracing sources of epistemic uncertainty in deep learning predictions: homo- and hetero-scedastic linearized estimators
Aug 11
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.