Predicting Performance of Symbolic and Prompt Programs with Examples
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Predicting Performance of Symbolic and Prompt Programs with Examples
Abstract:LLM prompting is widely used for naturally stated tasks, yet it is unreliable it may succeed on a few test cases but fail at deployment time. We study performance prediction: given a program, either symbolic (e.g. Python) or a prompt executed on an LLM, and a few in-domain examples, predict its performance on unseen tasks from the same domain. We use a simple coin-flip model, treating each pass/fail program execution as a Bernoulli random variable, whose success probability is the programs unknown performance. In this model, performance depends entirely on: 1) the observed execution outcomes on test cases, and 2) a prior over performances. We compile empirical performance priors from a corpus of diverse programs and tasks, and find that performance for symbolic programs (e.g., Python) are all or nothing, while prompt programs have a diffuse prior with many nearly-correct programs. This difference explains why a few passing tests can certify symbolic programs but not prompt programs. Building on this insight, we develop RAP (Retrieved Approximate Prior), which retrieves similar tasks and prompt programs from an existing corpus to construct a proxy prior, which is then used to predict performance. We show RAP achieves solid performances.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.21515 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.21515v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21515
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Temporal Contrastive Transformer for Financial Crime Detection: Self-Supervised Sequence Embeddings via Predictive Contrastive Coding
May 22
-
Teaching Language Models to Forecast Research Success Through Comparative Idea Evaluation
May 22
-
The Attribution Impossibility: No Feature Ranking Is Faithful, Stable, and Complete Under Collinearity
May 22
-
Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins
May 22
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.