Data-Augmented Game Starts for Accelerating Self-Play Exploration in Imperfect Information Games
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Data-Augmented Game Starts for Accelerating Self-Play Exploration in Imperfect Information Games
Abstract:Finding approximate equilibria for large-scale imperfect-information competitive games such as StarCraft, Dota, and CounterStrike remains computationally infeasible due to sparse rewards and challenging exploration over long horizons. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent starting-state sampling strategy designed to substantially accelerate online exploration in regularized policy-gradient game methods for two-player zero-sum (2p0s) games. Motivated by an assumption that offline demonstrations from skilled humans can provide good coverage of high-level strategies relevant to equilibrium play, we propose the initialization of reinforcement learning data collection at intermediate states sampled from offline data to facilitate exploration of strategically relevant subgames. Referring to this method as Data-Augmented Game Starts (DAGS), we perform experiments using synthetic datasets and analytically tractable, long-horizon control variants of two-player Kuhn Poker, Goofspiel, and a counterexample game designed to penalize biased beliefs over hidden information. Under fixed computational budgets, DAGS enables regularized policy gradient methods to achieve lower exploitability in games with significantly more challenging exploration. We show that augmenting starting state distributions when solving imperfect information games can lead to biased equilibria, and we provide a straightforward mitigation to this in the form of multi-task observation flags. Finally, we release a new set of benchmark environments that drastically increase exploration challenges and state counts in existing OpenSpiel games while keeping exploitability measurements analytically tractable.
| Comments: | 17 pages, 4 figures. JB Lanier and Nathan Monette contributed equally |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.14379 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.14379v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14379
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Vision-Based Runtime Monitoring under Varying Specifications using Semantic Latent Representations
May 15
-
Mechanistic Interpretability of EEG Foundation Models via Sparse Autoencoders
May 15
-
Rethinking Molecular OOD Generalization via Target-Aware Source Selection
May 15
-
Unsupervised learning of acquisition variability in structural connectomes via hybrid latent space modeling
May 15
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.