X: <a href=\"https://x.com/longphan3110/status/2058933197535170787\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://x.com/longphan3110/status/2058933197535170787</a></p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-05-29T14:51:46.547Z","author":{"_id":"62184306e1ef90f6e56dc116","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1645757180654-noauth.jpeg","fullname":"Long Phan","name":"justinphan3110","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":22,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.5297953486442566},"editors":["justinphan3110"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1645757180654-noauth.jpeg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}},{"id":"6a1a413f5dd65b050cf4e385","author":{"_id":"63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg","fullname":"Librarian Bot (Bot)","name":"librarian-bot","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":359,"isUserFollowing":false},"createdAt":"2026-05-30T01:45:35.000Z","type":"comment","data":{"edited":false,"hidden":false,"latest":{"raw":"This is an automated message from the [Librarian Bot](https://huggingface.co/librarian-bots). I found the following papers similar to this paper. \n\nThe following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API \n\n* [A Multi-Dimensional Audit of Politically Aligned Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.24429) (2026)\n* [Pressure, What Pressure? Sycophancy Disentanglement in Language Models via Reward Decomposition](https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.05279) (2026)\n* [Auditing Stance Asymmetry in Generative Explanations](https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.27988) (2026)\n* [Measuring Opinion Bias and Sycophancy via LLM-based Persuasion](https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.21564) (2026)\n* [Redirected, Not Removed: Task-Dependent Stereotyping Reveals the Limits of LLM Alignments](https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.02669) (2026)\n* [Polarization by Default: Auditing Recommendation Bias in LLM-Based Content Curation](https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.15937) (2026)\n* [How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.22880) (2026)\n\n\n Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!\n\n If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout [this](https://huggingface.co/spaces/librarian-bots/recommend_similar_papers) Space\n\n You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: `@librarian-bot recommend`","html":"<p>This is an automated message from the <a href=\"https://huggingface.co/librarian-bots\">Librarian Bot</a>. I found the following papers similar to this paper. </p>\n<p>The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API </p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.24429\">A Multi-Dimensional Audit of Politically Aligned Large Language Models</a> (2026)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.05279\">Pressure, What Pressure? Sycophancy Disentanglement in Language Models via Reward Decomposition</a> (2026)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.27988\">Auditing Stance Asymmetry in Generative Explanations</a> (2026)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.21564\">Measuring Opinion Bias and Sycophancy via LLM-based Persuasion</a> (2026)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.02669\">Redirected, Not Removed: Task-Dependent Stereotyping Reveals the Limits of LLM Alignments</a> (2026)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.15937\">Polarization by Default: Auditing Recommendation Bias in LLM-Based Content Curation</a> (2026)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.22880\">How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models</a> (2026)</li>\n</ul>\n<p> Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!</p>\n<p> If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout <a href=\"https://huggingface.co/spaces/librarian-bots/recommend_similar_papers\">this</a> Space</p>\n<p> You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: <code><span class=\"SVELTE_PARTIAL_HYDRATER contents\" data-target=\"UserMention\" data-props=\"{"user":"librarian-bot"}\"><span class=\"inline-block\"><span class=\"contents\"><a href=\"/librarian-bot\">@<span class=\"underline\">librarian-bot</span></a></span> </span></span> recommend</code></p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-05-30T01:45:35.078Z","author":{"_id":"63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg","fullname":"Librarian Bot (Bot)","name":"librarian-bot","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":359,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.7415382862091064},"editors":["librarian-bot"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2605.22771","authors":[{"_id":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d80","name":"Long Phan","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d81","name":"Devin Kim","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d82","name":"Alexander Pan","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d83","name":"Alice Blair","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d84","name":"Adam Khoja","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d85","name":"Dan Hendrycks","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z","title":"Reducing Political Manipulation with Consistency Training","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"62184306e1ef90f6e56dc116","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1645757180654-noauth.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Long Phan","user":"justinphan3110","type":"user","name":"justinphan3110"},"summary":"Large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic political bias across a variety of sensitive contexts. We find that LLMs handle counterpart topics from opposing political sides asymmetrically. We refer to this phenomenon as covert political bias and identify 7 categories of techniques through which it operates. We propose two metrics for covert bias: Sentiment Consistency measures symmetry in rhetoric and framing across paired political prompts; Helpfulness Consistency measures symmetric depth and engagement. To reduce both types of covert bias, we introduce Political Consistency Training (PCT), an RL training method with two complementary paradigms: Sentiment Consistency Training and Helpfulness Consistency Training. We show that PCT preserves overall helpfulness, substantially reduces covert political bias, and generalizes to held-out benchmarks. We release our work at https://political-manipulation.ai","upvotes":0,"discussionId":"6a19a7b8808ddbc3c7d42d86","projectPage":"https://political-manipulation.ai/","githubRepo":"https://github.com/centerforaisafety/political-manipulation","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"Large language models demonstrate systematic political bias in handling opposing viewpoints, which can be mitigated through a reinforcement learning approach that maintains helpfulness while reducing bias.","ai_keywords":["large language models","political bias","covert political bias","sentiment consistency","helpfulness consistency","political consistency training","reinforcement learning"],"githubStars":0,"organization":{"_id":"645b6ac81c24cd669dd67f73","name":"cais","fullname":"Center for AI Safety","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/5fbfd09ee366524fe8e97cd3/rQf-w-qSxQgwmXAA3YBfe.jpeg"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"organization":{"_id":"645b6ac81c24cd669dd67f73","name":"cais","fullname":"Center for AI Safety","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/5fbfd09ee366524fe8e97cd3/rQf-w-qSxQgwmXAA3YBfe.jpeg"}}">
Reducing Political Manipulation with Consistency Training
Abstract
Large language models demonstrate systematic political bias in handling opposing viewpoints, which can be mitigated through a reinforcement learning approach that maintains helpfulness while reducing bias.
AI-generated summary
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic political bias across a variety of sensitive contexts. We find that LLMs handle counterpart topics from opposing political sides asymmetrically. We refer to this phenomenon as covert political bias and identify 7 categories of techniques through which it operates. We propose two metrics for covert bias: Sentiment Consistency measures symmetry in rhetoric and framing across paired political prompts; Helpfulness Consistency measures symmetric depth and engagement. To reduce both types of covert bias, we introduce Political Consistency Training (PCT), an RL training method with two complementary paradigms: Sentiment Consistency Training and Helpfulness Consistency Training. We show that PCT preserves overall helpfulness, substantially reduces covert political bias, and generalizes to held-out benchmarks. We release our work at https://political-manipulation.ai
Community
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.22771 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.22771 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.22771 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.