Would you say capture-time semantic annotation for robot trajectories is a solved problem? [R]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
It seems raw teleoperation data (RGB + joint states) structurally lacks affordance, contact intent, and embodiment-specific kinematic context. (information that can't be reliably recovered post-hoc once the demonstration is recorded)
Most current approaches either filter/clean after collection, or rely on simulation to compensate. But neither seems to close the semantic gap for contact-rich tasks in unstructured environments.
Is anyone working on supervision at acquisition time, enriching the stream as it's captured rather than labeling after the fact?
And if not, is this a real bottleneck or am I overestimating the problem?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
Aug 14
-
Building text to ASCII diffusion model , need advice and guidance [P]
Aug 14
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.