Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting
Abstract:Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance. Accurate attribution on unmodified text, however, does not show whether the prediction still identifies the original source after deliberate rewriting. We formulate this problem as targeted fingerprint transfer: rewriting one model's output so that attribution classifiers assign it to a chosen target model. We study summarization, where different models receive the same document and express the same underlying content, providing a controlled setting for conditional generation. We introduce ForgePrint, a search-then-distil framework that first searches for rewrites that move attribution toward a target fingerprint, then distils the selected rewrites into a one-pass 4B Student model. On CNN/DM, the Student reaches 70.2% target success rate, outperforming both its Teacher (54.1%) and the strongest of six published rewriting baselines (39.3%), against held-out classifiers that are never queried by the attack. It also reaches 68.3% target success when transferring summaries from an open model toward chosen commercial models. These results show that fingerprint detectability should not be conflated with source authenticity, and that text-only attribution can provide misleading evidence of model identity under targeted rewriting, even when it is accurate on unmodified text.
| Comments: | 31 pages, 7 figures, 25 tables. Project page: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.38831 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.38831v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38831
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Large Language Models are Approximate Survival Estimators
Oct 1
-
TomasuLLM: Out-of-Order Speculative Execution for LLM Agents
Oct 1
-
Automatic estimation of verbal fluency index in people with Motor Neuron Disease using ASR alignment and pause modelling
Oct 1
-
The System Prompt Illusion: How Instruction Preambles Modify Computation in Language Models
Oct 1
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.