WMAttack: Automated Attack Search for Adversarial Evaluation of World-Model Agents
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:WMAttack: Automated Attack Search for Adversarial Evaluation of World-Model Agents
Abstract:Despite the growing use of world models as decision-making agents, their adversarial robustness remains underexplored due to the lack of dedicated automated evaluation methods. A key obstacle is that attack evaluation must be both accurate and efficient: weak manually tuned attacks can overestimate robustness, while exhaustive hyperparameter search is prohibitively expensive because each candidate requires closed-loop rollouts through learned latent dynamics. We introduce WMAttack, an automated attack-search framework for adversarial evaluation of world-model agents. WMAttack formulates robustness evaluation as a finite-budget search over attack configurations, including attack families, perturbation budgets, optimization steps, restarts, and allocation rules. To improve search accuracy, Self-Correcting Attack Search (SCAS) refines the attack proposal distribution using feedback from reward degradation, action instability, runtime cost, and rollout variability. To improve search efficiency, Representation-Guided Attack Retrieval (RGAR) retrieves effective historical configurations from representation-similar tasks, providing a warm start for unseen environments. We provide a theoretical explanation showing that proposal refinement improves finite-budget search when it shifts probability mass toward high-utility attacks. Across Atari and DeepMind Control tasks, WMAttack consistently discovers stronger attacks than the evaluated baselines, improving normalized reward drop from 0.497 to 1.034 on DreamerV3 Atari and from 0.319 to 0.682 on DMC. Ablations further show that RGAR improves initial candidate quality and SCAS improves final attack utility under fixed evaluation budgets.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.23220 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.23220v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23220
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Latent Cache Flow: Model-to-Model Communication Without Text
May 25
-
Reading Calibrated Uncertainty from Language Model Trajectories
May 25
-
FusionSense: Tri-Stage Near-Sensor Learning for Runtime-Adaptive Multimodal Edge Intelligence
May 25
-
FuRA: Full-Rank Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Spectral Preconditioning
May 25
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.