Deep Reinforcement Learning with Buffered Quantile Objectives
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Deep Reinforcement Learning with Buffered Quantile Objectives
Abstract:Quantile-based reinforcement learning provides an interpretable approach to risk-sensitive decision-making by optimizing a prescribed quantile of the cumulative-return distribution. Despite this appeal, learning under a point quantile objective is challenging: quantiles can change abruptly under small perturbations of the return distribution, and exact quantile-sensitive planning requires computationally demanding distributional optimization. Lower-buffered quantiles alleviate the former difficulty by averaging neighboring quantiles immediately below the target level, providing a smoother surrogate while preserving the underlying point-quantile objective. Existing methods based on this principle, however, remain model-based and rely on explicit return-law planning, limiting their applicability beyond small tabular problems. We develop Deep-BQRL, a model-free distributional reinforcement-learning framework that extends buffered-quantile learning to neural function approximation. The method learns conditional return quantiles directly from sampled transitions, constructs buffered action scores from the relevant region of the learned quantile function, and uses ensemble disagreement to guide exploration. An augmented input representation allows the learned policy to respond to trajectory information without explicitly reproducing the quantile-state recursion required by exact planning. Experiments on an asset-selling optimal-stopping problem and slippery FrozenLake compare Deep-BQRL with model-based UCB-BQRL and tabular PPO and TRPO implementations. In asset selling, Deep-BQRL attains smaller mean cumulative point-quantile policy gaps than PPO and TRPO at the reported target levels, while UCB-BQRL retains the smallest gaps. The learned stopping decisions also vary with the target quantile, providing an interpretable illustration of the method's risk-sensitive behavior.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.21327 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.21327v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21327
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Mohammad Alipour-Vaezi [view email][v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 05:17:52 UTC (408 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Freeze the Decoder, Heal the Encoder: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation for SVD-Based KV-Cache Compression
Oct 9
-
SPERA: Spherical Prior EEG Foundation Model with Geometry- and Frequency-Aware Latent Prediction
Oct 9
-
Coverage, Not Difficulty, Sets How Much Synthetic Data an Activation Probe Needs
Oct 9
-
Temporal transformer CAN encoder with federated lightweight heads for anomaly detection
Oct 9
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.