arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Multi-Omics-Based Breast Cancer Prediction

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.16250 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Jun 2026]

Title:Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Multi-Omics-Based Breast Cancer Prediction

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Multi-Omics-Based Breast Cancer Prediction, by Priyanka Paudel and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Estrogen Receptor (ER) status is a critical biomarker in breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have enabled the generation of multi-omics datasets that provide complementary molecular information for computational prediction tasks. This study presents a systematic benchmarking analysis of classical machine learning models for ER status prediction using transcriptomic (RNA expression), genomic (copy number variation; CNV), and proteomic (RPPA) data from the TCGA-BRCA cohort. A rigorous experimental framework incorporating stratified train-test splitting, stratified five-fold cross-validation, class imbalance handling, and fold-specific feature selection was employed to ensure reliable evaluation and prevent data leakage. Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Logistic Regression were evaluated across single-omic and multi-omic settings. Results demonstrated that RNA expression provided the strongest predictive signal, while multi-omic integration yielded modest but consistent improvements over individual modalities. Among all evaluated approaches, Random Forest achieved the best overall performance in the integrated multi-omic setting, obtaining a balanced accuracy of 90.3\% and an ROC-AUC of 97.1\%. Furthermore, recurrent selection of biologically relevant genes, including \textit{ESR1}, \textit{PGR}, \textit{FOXA1}, and \textit{GATA3}, supported the biological validity of the learned models. These findings indicate that carefully regularized classical machine learning methods remain highly effective for small, high-dimensional genomic datasets and that multi-omic integration provides complementary information for breast cancer ER status prediction.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.16250 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.16250v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16250
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Madan Baduwal [view email]
[v1] Sat, 27 Jun 2026 02:46:40 UTC (1,687 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Multi-Omics-Based Breast Cancer Prediction, by Priyanka Paudel and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning