Is anyone prioritizing code quality checks via a small local model?
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Sorry if the title is confusing. What I'm trying to say is that since coding agents can write a lot of code very quickly and it can kinda get messy overtime if unchecked frequently.
Shouldn't there be a tiny local model with a TESTING(dot)md or a QUALITY(dot)md which describes our coding standards and that model is specifically trained to make sure code is secure, safe, good quality, maintainable, etc.
I'm mentioning a local model because large codebases can get expensive to send to a cloud LLM when it comes to checking the quality frequently.
I am not an expert and maybe something already exists out there. I'm not talking about code rabbit or other similar tools. This is local only and specifically trained to make spaghetti code into clean readable and secure code.
[link] [comments]
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.