How competitive are journals compared to top ai conferences? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Hi everyone,
The NeurIPS results aren’t out yet, but I’m expecting my paper to be rejected, so I’m considering submitting it to a journal instead.
My scores were 2/3/3 (3/4/4). I feel like I would probably get a similar outcome if I submitted the paper to ICLR or CVPR, so at this point I’m leaning toward a journal rather than trying another top conference.
I’m obviously not aiming for top-tier journals like TPAMI, IJCV, or TMLR. I’m considering journals that are a step below those, and I was wondering how difficult the review process and acceptance bar are compared with top ai conferences like NeurIPS.
The journals I’m currently considering are:
- Pattern Recognition
- Neurocomputing
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Neural Networks
- Expert Systems with Applications
For those who have experience submitting to these journals, how would you compare their review standards and acceptance difficulty such as NeurIPS, CVPR, or ICLR?
I’d also appreciate any thoughts on which of these journals might be a reasonable target for a paper that received scores around this range at NeurIPS.
For context, the paper is about attention mechanisms for Vision Transformers, with the main contribution being a modification to the attention module.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
How can I turn an industry ML project into a publication? [R]
Sep 28
-
Are there any good research papers around Text clustering using LLMs [R]
Sep 28
-
Free, open-source AI engineering course where you build each algorithm by hand: 523 lessons, now as EPUB/PDF books [P]
Sep 28
-
Two-stage shelf audit: YOLO finds the products, embeddings can't tell sibling SKUS apart. What should Stage 2 be? [P]
Sep 27
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.