How to get rejected by IEEE T-PAMI with 'Excellent' scores?[D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
| | Hello everyone. I am keeping my identity anonymous today to protect my professional career. I am a junior researcher in Computer Vision, and I am sharing this story because I have hit a devastating deadlock with IEEE T-PAMI and the IEEE Ethics Office. Our Situation:In the decision letter, we actually received three highly positive reviews (Two EXCELLENT, One GOOD). However, the AE rejected the paper by quoting comments from a "4th" reviewer.
We have formally requested the IEEE (and Computer Society) to thoroughly investigate this issue, specifically asking them to check AE's backend activity logs in the submission system. However, half a year has passed, and we have received no direct response. Has anyone experienced something similar with IEEE or other top venues? Any advice or help bringing visibility to this would be greatly appreciated. Evidence:Below is the report to IEEE Ethics (identifying information has been covered): [link] [comments] |
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.