arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

KnowledgeGain: Evaluating and Optimizing Science News Generation for Reader Learning

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.31099 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 May 2026]

Title:KnowledgeGain: Evaluating and Optimizing Science News Generation for Reader Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled KnowledgeGain: Evaluating and Optimizing Science News Generation for Reader Learning, by Dominik So\'os and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Science news is an important medium to communicate discoveries between the research communities and the public. Yet, most metrics for generated or summarized text evaluate semantic similarity and factual consistency, but do not measure how much knowledge readers learn from the news. We introduce KnowledgeGain, a metric that evaluates the quality of science news by measuring how much knowledge readers gained after reading it. To evaluate the metric, we first performed a controlled human study and showed that the metric successfully captures the differential knowledge gained by human readers reading different types of science media. The data allowed us to calibrate a prompt-only LLM reader simulator. We use it to rank and filter candidate articles before human evaluation. A second human study shows that articles selected with this simulator improve post-reading accuracy and normalized KnowledgeGain over a strong generation baseline. Our work is a step toward generating science news that better meets the knowledge and comprehension goals of Bloom's Taxonomy.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.31099 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.31099v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31099
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Dominik Soós [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 10:12:07 UTC (2,642 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled KnowledgeGain: Evaluating and Optimizing Science News Generation for Reader Learning, by Dominik So\'os and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language