arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

EviGen: Predictive Evidence Scaffolding for Verifiable Clinical Rationale Generation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.18852 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Sep 2026]

Title:EviGen: Predictive Evidence Scaffolding for Verifiable Clinical Rationale Generation

View a PDF of the paper titled EviGen: Predictive Evidence Scaffolding for Verifiable Clinical Rationale Generation, by Fengnan Li and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) capture years of patient history across notes, codes, labs, and procedures, and contain evidence needed to reason about likely clinical outcomes. However, comprehensive clinician review of these records is impractical, and LLM-based processing is costly and often unreliable, missing some relevant observations while hallucinating others. We therefore propose EviGen, a three-layer framework for verifiable clinical rationale generation that addresses these challenges. The first layer is a patient-conditioned retriever that uses learnable queries to find evidence predictive of, not just textually relevant to, a clinical outcome and ranks it by prediction attribution scores. The second layer is an LLM generator that consumes this ranked evidence as a scaffold to produce a clinical rationale grounded in the retrieved spans. The third layer is a process-supervised verifier that checks the generated rationale at the reasoning-step level, flagging unreliable claims. Across three medical prediction datasets, EviGen improves prediction performance and rationale faithfulness over full-context LLM and RAG baselines, and is preferred by clinical reviewers in a usability evaluation.
Comments: Accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026. 29 pages, 4 figures, 23 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
ACM classes: I.2.7; J.3
Cite as: arXiv:2609.18852 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.18852v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18852
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Fengnan Li [view email]
[v1] Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:55:41 UTC (2,038 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language