arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.02155 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models

Authors:Piyush Sao
View a PDF of the paper titled Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models, by Piyush Sao
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma guarantees that a random projection of $n$ points to
$m=O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log n)$ dimensions preserves pairwise squared distances within relative
error $\varepsilon$ with high probability, and this dimension order is asymptotically
optimal. In high dimensions, however, distances concentrate around a baseline while key
geometric information lies in much smaller fluctuations. We show that the JL bound can
therefore be uninformative about retained geometry: an independent Gaussian replacement map
can satisfy it even though the replacement cloud is independent of the original data.
We then ask how well any decoder can recover a feature $f(D)$ of a squared distance $D$ from
a linear sketch. Under squared-error loss, the optimal decoder is conditional expectation, so
recovery defines a linear operator whose singular values quantify feature recovery. For
isotropic Gaussian data ($\Sigma=\sigma^2 I_d$), we diagonalize this operator in closed form.
For fixed $k$ with $m,d-m\to\infty$, its $k$th singular value satisfies $\ell_k\approx(m/
d)^{k/2}$.
This yields three sharp consequences. A rank-$m$ sketch retains at most an $m/d$ fraction of
the variance of any feature of one squared distance. If $m\to\infty$ and $m/d\to0$, the
expected Kendall correlation is $\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{m/d}(1+o(1))$; for fixed $q$, nearest-
neighbor agreement tends to $1/q$. Yet one projection can satisfy the JL bound while mean
Kendall correlation vanishes when $\log n\ll m\ll d$. After removing scale, Haar-averaged
retained covariance-shape information is $(m/d)^2$. Thus JL distance preservation does not
quantify the geometry available for comparison or inference.
Comments: 41 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables. Reproducibility code: this https URL (pinned as a submodule). Companion paper on nearest-neighbor graphs to follow
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Theory (cs.IT); Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Probability (math.PR); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
MSC classes: 60D05, 62H12, 68W20
ACM classes: G.3; F.2.1
Cite as: arXiv:2609.02155 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.02155v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02155
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Piyush Sao [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 06:12:34 UTC (290 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models, by Piyush Sao
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning