Applicability of memorization indicators for early spotting of overfitting while recalibrating sEMG-decoders on low sample sizes
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Applicability of memorization indicators for early spotting of overfitting while recalibrating sEMG-decoders on low sample sizes
Abstract:Deep learning models for surface electromyography (sEMG) can benefit substantially from subject-specific (re-)calibration, since no sufficiently large and diverse datasets are available to train fully generic decoders. However, for user acceptance, the number of repetitions that can realistically be collected during calibration is severely limited, which increases the risk of overfitting and, in extreme cases, can even degrade performance compared to the uncalibrated model. Classical overfitting indicators such as validation performance and regularization with early stopping are difficult to apply in this low-sample regime, as they require additional held-out data that is rarely available in practical calibration scenarios. In this work, we investigate a recently proposed class of memorization indicators based solely on the activation statistics of rectified linear units (ReLU) in deep neural networks, which can be computed directly from training data without any extra validation set. We conduct a transferlearning experiment on a benchmark sEMG dataset, where a convolutional neural network is first pre-trained on multiple subjects and subsequently fine-tuned on individual users using only a small number of repetitions. During calibration, we monitor both decoding performance and the activation behaviour of the last hidden layer. Our results provide first evidence that decreases in test accuracy during fine-tuning are ac companied by characteristic changes in activation rates, indicating that activation-based memorization indicators are a promising tool for early spotting of unsuccessful learning in low-sample sEMG calibration settings.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.27855 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.27855v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27855
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Stephan Lehmler [view email][v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:53:12 UTC (10,153 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Can AI Draw Science? A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Figure Generation by Text-to-Image and Multimodal Models
Jun 30
-
On the Necessity of a Liquid Substrate for Mesh Intelligence
Jun 30
-
Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy
Jun 30
-
Learning to Distributedly Estimate under Partially Known Dynamics: A Covariance-Agnostic Neural Kalman Consensus Filter
Jun 30
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.