Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning
Abstract:Ensuring safety in reinforcement learning under nonstationarity requires determining whether a learning system can safely adapt to forecasted environmental change within the required recovery horizon. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods typically assume stationary environments and do not explicitly consider adaptation speed as a safety concern. However, when environments evolve over time, delayed adaptation may result in transient unsafe behavior.
This paper proposes adjustment speed as a safety constraint for nonstationary reinforcement learning. The central idea is to define safety in terms of adaptation feasibility: future states or regions may become unsafe when the adaptation required to remain safe exceeds the learning system's calibrated recovery capacity. The proposed framework uses learned context representations and short-horizon context forecasts to estimate adaptation demand and compare it with the agent's achievable adaptation capacity.
When predicted adaptation demand exceeds the calibrated recovery capacity, the framework proactively tightens the admissible action set and activates an action-level shield to reduce unsafe behavior before violations occur.
Experiments in a nonstationary driving environment show that the proposed approach primarily reduces safety violations in short-horizon windows aligned with context changes. Ablation studies further show that shielding is more conservative for peak- and tail-risk suppression, while optimization-level adjustment provides additional reductions in short-horizon switch-conditioned violations.
These results support adaptation feasibility as a practical safety principle for reinforcement learning under nonstationarity and demonstrate that proactive intervention can improve safety during periods of environmental change.
| Comments: | 15 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Preprint |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.21646 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.21646v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21646
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Timofey Tomashevskiy [view email][v1] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:52:07 UTC (405 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
LoKiFormer: Locality-aware Attention with Decoupled Knowledge Memory for Efficient Large Language Model Pretraining
Aug 14
-
Which Site, and When: A Free-Satellite-Data Test of Himalayan Glacial Lake Bursts, Landslides, and Ice Floods
Aug 14
-
MARCH: Scaling Recurrent Memory with Content-Routed State Anchors
Aug 14
-
Multi-AUV Ad-hoc network-based Target Tracking: A Value Gradient Guidance Multi-Agent Diffusion Reinforcement Learning Approach
Aug 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.