The Truth Was Never Gone: Perfect Aliasing in Compliant-Context Truth Probes
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:The Truth Was Never Gone: Perfect Aliasing in Compliant-Context Truth Probes
Abstract:A truth probe fitted where truthful reporting and a task's prescribed action coincide cannot distinguish those targets from its fitting labels alone. We call this failure of semantic identification perfect aliasing. In a controlled binary reporting game, truth and prescribed-action probes fitted on compliant contexts solve the same optimization. On rival contexts their labels are complements, forcing their AUROCs to sum to one; this identity holds across 751 cell-layer pairs to floating-point precision. We separate prescribed output symbols from semantic action using randomized codebooks, then separate truth from prescribed action by fitting on mixed compliant and rival contexts. For a reward-trained Gemma-2-9B policy that answers falsely on all evaluated rival trials, the conventional probe scores $0.006 \pm 0.005$ AUROC across three training seeds, while mixed-fit probes score $1.000$ on the same held-out activations. Mixed fitting uses more training examples and access to labelled rival contexts, so this comparison establishes linear recoverability rather than isolating the benefit of decorrelation. We also show that two compliant-fit probes, both perfect in-distribution, score $0.080$ and $0.986$ on the same rival activations. The findings concern what a probe measures: they do not establish preserved functional belief, causal use of the recovered direction, or a deployable deception detector. Code and aggregate results accompany the paper.
| Comments: | 36 pages, 15 figures. Code and aggregate results: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.10739 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.10739v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10739
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Learn Your Own Thoughts: Abstract Token Curriculum
Sep 18
-
Uni-LaDiR: Latent Diffusion Unifies Multimodal Reasoning
Sep 18
-
MATCH: Model-Aware Tool Learning with Curriculum Scheduling and Hierarchically Gated Rewards
Sep 18
-
Modality Discrepancy Transformer for Ambivalence and Hesitancy Recognition
Sep 18
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.