arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Decision-Aware Evaluation of Physics-Informed Surrogates

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2606.07146 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]

Title:Decision-Aware Evaluation of Physics-Informed Surrogates

View a PDF of the paper titled Decision-Aware Evaluation of Physics-Informed Surrogates, by Daniel Cie\'slak and Andrzej Czy\.zewski
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Physics-informed machine learning is often assessed by curve error, although engineering use depends on downstream decisions: ranking candidates, avoiding infeasible designs and limiting regret. We introduce pinn-gym, an open benchmark for material-conditioned lattice design that couples a transparent reduced-order crush-and-impact oracle with five printable polymer cards, dimensionless force-response targets and a protocol spanning curve fidelity, physical admissibility, top-k retrieval and mass regret.
Across per-material, pooled and cross-material settings, low nRMSE is frequently insufficient to identify useful design selections. Physics-informed losses alter trade-offs rather than monotonically improving all metrics, and dimensionless conditioning improves comparability without making transfer symmetric. The benchmark is not a certified material model; within the released oracle, candidate generator and material cards, pinn-gym provides a reproducible testbed for evaluating PIML surrogates as decision systems rather than curve predictors alone.
Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures, 9 tables. Code and data available at this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE)
MSC classes: 68T07, 68T05, 65D15, 74S05
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.8; J.2
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07146 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2606.07146v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07146
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Daniel Cieślak [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 11:00:46 UTC (7,107 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning