arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

IMLJD: A Computational Dataset for Indian Matrimonial Litigation Analysis

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.19346 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 May 2026]

Title:IMLJD: A Computational Dataset for Indian Matrimonial Litigation Analysis

Authors:Joy Bose
View a PDF of the paper titled IMLJD: A Computational Dataset for Indian Matrimonial Litigation Analysis, by Joy Bose
View PDF
Abstract:We present IMLJD, an open dataset of 3,613 Indian court judgments covering matrimonial disputes under IPC Section 498A, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, and CrPC Section 482. The dataset covers the Supreme Court of India from 2000 to 2024 (1,474 cases) and the Karnataka High Court from 2018 to 2024 (2,139 cases), with structured outcome labels, metadata-derived indicators, and a knowledge graph. We find that 57.6% of quashing petitions succeed at the Supreme Court level compared to 39.7% at the Karnataka High Court level. On a matched 2018 to 2024 period, the SC quash rate is 59.3%, widening the differential to 19.6 percentage points and confirming the finding is robust to temporal adjustment. The dataset, code, and knowledge graph are released openly at this https URL and this https URL.
Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. Dataset available at this http URL and Code at this http URL
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: H.3.1; I.2.7; K.4.1
Cite as: arXiv:2605.19346 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.19346v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19346
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Joy Bose [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 04:34:06 UTC (281 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled IMLJD: A Computational Dataset for Indian Matrimonial Litigation Analysis, by Joy Bose
  • View PDF

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language