Machine-Learning-Enhanced Non-Invasive Testing for MASLD Fibrosis: Shallow-Deep Neural Networks Versus FIB-4, Tabular Foundation Models, and Large Language Models
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Machine-Learning-Enhanced Non-Invasive Testing for MASLD Fibrosis: Shallow-Deep Neural Networks Versus FIB-4, Tabular Foundation Models, and Large Language Models
Abstract:Advanced fibrosis is a major determinant of liver-related morbidity in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). FIB-4 is widely used as a first-line non-invasive test, but its fixed formula may underuse diagnostic information contained in age, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count. We evaluated whether machine-learning-enhanced non-invasive testing (MLE-NIT) can improve advanced fibrosis detection while preserving this FIB-4 variable space.
We used three biopsy-confirmed MASLD cohorts from China, Malaysia, and India (n=784). The Chinese cohort was split into 486 training and 54 internal validation/tuning patients; final performance was reported only on the Malaysian and Indian external cohorts. Models used five variables: age, FIB-4, aspartate aminotransferase, platelet count, and alanine aminotransferase. We compared FIB-4 with a shallow-deep neural network (s-DNN), TabPFN, and gpt-4o-2024-08-06.
FIB-4 achieved external ROC-AUCs of 0.75 and 0.60 in Malaysia and India, respectively. TabPFN achieved 0.69 and 0.66, fine-tuned GPT-4o achieved 0.75 and 0.63, and the s-DNN achieved 0.77 and 0.67, respectively. The s-DNN contained only 354 trainable parameters, compared with 7,244,554 for TabPFN, yet provided a more balanced external operating profile. Calibration showed s-DNN Brier scores of 0.18 and 0.22, and permutation importance identified AST and FIB-4 as dominant variables. Compact non-linear MLE-NITs may enhance FIB-4-based fibrosis assessment without increasing clinical data requirements.
| Comments: | 26 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables. Preprint |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20523 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20523v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20523
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Athanasios Angelakis [view email][v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 21:51:02 UTC (604 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Neural Estimation of Pairwise Mutual Information in Masked Discrete Sequence Models
May 21
-
GraphDiffMed: Knowledge-Constrained Differential Attention with Pharmacological Graph Priors for Medication Recommendation
May 21
-
TabPFN-MT: A Natively Multitask In-Context Learner for Tabular Data
May 21
-
Provably Learning Diffusion Models under the Manifold Hypothesis: Collapse and Refine
May 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.