arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Machine-Learning-Enhanced Non-Invasive Testing for MASLD Fibrosis: Shallow-Deep Neural Networks Versus FIB-4, Tabular Foundation Models, and Large Language Models

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2605.20523 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 May 2026]

Title:Machine-Learning-Enhanced Non-Invasive Testing for MASLD Fibrosis: Shallow-Deep Neural Networks Versus FIB-4, Tabular Foundation Models, and Large Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Machine-Learning-Enhanced Non-Invasive Testing for MASLD Fibrosis: Shallow-Deep Neural Networks Versus FIB-4, Tabular Foundation Models, and Large Language Models, by Athanasios Angelakis and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Advanced fibrosis is a major determinant of liver-related morbidity in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). FIB-4 is widely used as a first-line non-invasive test, but its fixed formula may underuse diagnostic information contained in age, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count. We evaluated whether machine-learning-enhanced non-invasive testing (MLE-NIT) can improve advanced fibrosis detection while preserving this FIB-4 variable space.
We used three biopsy-confirmed MASLD cohorts from China, Malaysia, and India (n=784). The Chinese cohort was split into 486 training and 54 internal validation/tuning patients; final performance was reported only on the Malaysian and Indian external cohorts. Models used five variables: age, FIB-4, aspartate aminotransferase, platelet count, and alanine aminotransferase. We compared FIB-4 with a shallow-deep neural network (s-DNN), TabPFN, and gpt-4o-2024-08-06.
FIB-4 achieved external ROC-AUCs of 0.75 and 0.60 in Malaysia and India, respectively. TabPFN achieved 0.69 and 0.66, fine-tuned GPT-4o achieved 0.75 and 0.63, and the s-DNN achieved 0.77 and 0.67, respectively. The s-DNN contained only 354 trainable parameters, compared with 7,244,554 for TabPFN, yet provided a more balanced external operating profile. Calibration showed s-DNN Brier scores of 0.18 and 0.22, and permutation importance identified AST and FIB-4 as dominant variables. Compact non-linear MLE-NITs may enhance FIB-4-based fibrosis assessment without increasing clinical data requirements.
Comments: 26 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables. Preprint
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.20523 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2605.20523v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20523
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Athanasios Angelakis [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 May 2026 21:51:02 UTC (604 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Machine-Learning-Enhanced Non-Invasive Testing for MASLD Fibrosis: Shallow-Deep Neural Networks Versus FIB-4, Tabular Foundation Models, and Large Language Models, by Athanasios Angelakis and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning