Not All Synthetic Data Is Yours to Learn From
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Not All Synthetic Data Is Yours to Learn From
Abstract:Can a language model improve from plain text sampled from itself, with no prompts, no teacher, no verifier, and no reward model? Yes, but only when the synthetic corpus is compatible with the student, a relational property of the source-student pair rather than an intrinsic property of the data. We call this the latent capability resurfacing hypothesis: weak self-training can amplify capabilities already present in the pretrained model, but only under this compatibility condition. We study this in the minimal setting of prompt-free unconditional self-training, where base language models are fine-tuned on text generated from the BOS token alone, with no task specification or external supervision. We report three findings. First, synthetic utility is relational rather than intrinsic: self-generated data is the most effective source, same-lineage transfer outperforms stronger but differently trained sources, and cross-family transfer is substantially weaker. Second, common intrinsic proxies fail: neither benchmark-level semantic similarity nor average per-token likelihood under the student predicts which corpora help. Third, this regime produces a surprising byproduct. In controlled Pythia experiments, capability and verbatim memorization decouple: benchmark utility is preserved or improved while held-out exact-match extraction drops by over 95 percent, with no forget set, privacy objective, or targeted unlearning. Together, these results suggest that prompt-free self-training works by amplifying what the student already knows, not by importing structure from the data. They also reveal a regime in which capability and verbatim memorization can be separated without any explicit unlearning objective.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.31126 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.31126v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31126
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Protocol for evaluating ChatGPT in biomedical association generation and verification using a RAG-enabled, cross-model majority voting workflow
Jun 1
-
Exploring Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering for Model Specialization
Jun 1
-
Domain Adaptation and Reasoning Frameworks in Language Models: A Controlled Experiment with Historical Cosmology
Jun 1
-
Cross-Lingual Steering for Figurative Language Generation
Jun 1
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.