SpecDrop: Parameter-Free Category-Conditioned Routing for Modular Specialization
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:SpecDrop: Parameter-Free Category-Conditioned Routing for Modular Specialization
Abstract:Mixture-of-experts (MoE) networks pursue specialization through learned routers, gates, and load-balancing losses, yet at matched total-parameter budgets learned routers can underperform equal-weight No-Routing baselines. Is the bottleneck the routing algorithm, or the alignment between training-signal granularity and the target categories? We probe the question with SpecDrop, a fixed parameter-free routing scheme: each of $K$ branches receives weight $p_a$ for its assigned category and a small leakage $p_i > 0$ otherwise, merged through a category-independent fixed denominator, with no learned routing parameters and no auxiliary losses; the category label is required at inference. On vision tasks where each image has one superclass label (CIFAR-100 on ResNet-110; ImageNet-1K on ViT-S/16), SpecDrop reaches 79.23% on CIFAR-100 and 79.89% on ImageNet-1K, exceeding parameter-matched baselines that do not use the label (+4.75 over dense on CIFAR-100; +6.53 over the No-Routing+SE control on ImageNet-1K). These gains quantify what category supervision buys when deployed through routing -- not an advantage over label-aware deployments of the baselines: given the same label, masking a dense model's outputs is stronger for accuracy alone (85.2 / 83.7). SpecDrop's contribution is converting the label into trained-in modular structure: 58%/100% branch-category alignment, and masking gains of 0.00 (CIFAR) / +1.06 (ImageNet) -- the output-space restriction is largely internalized during training. On fuzzy partitions, where training units span multiple categories (SlimPajama-6B language modeling with a 30M Transformer; SuperNI instruction tuning over Llama-3.2-1B with LoRA), the routing mechanism reduces to the matched No-Routing controls within seed noise, the null our thesis predicts. Granularity alignment, not algorithm choice, localizes when routing helps. Code: this https URL
| Comments: | 35 pages, 6 figures. Code: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.04084 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.04084v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04084
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Auxiliary uncertainty signals for LLM-assisted systematic review screening: a benchmark across eight Cohen drug-class reviews
Aug 18
-
HarmProfile: Characterizing Harmful Distributions in Frontier LLMs
Aug 18
-
Multi-Modal Generative Fuzzy System: Fuzzy Inference Guided Large Model Interactive Question Answering Framework
Aug 18
-
Wiola 13M, a Gated Spiral Attention Architecture for Parameter Efficient Small Language Models
Aug 18
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.