The Bridge-Garden Dilemma in LLM Distillation: Why Mixing Hard and Soft Labels Works
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:The Bridge-Garden Dilemma in LLM Distillation: Why Mixing Hard and Soft Labels Works
Abstract:Knowledge distillation (KD) transfers knowledge from a large teacher model to a smaller student. In language modeling, the student is trained either on tokens sampled from the teacher (hard labels) or the teacher's full next-token distribution (soft labels). Despite soft labels appear strictly richer, we find that mixing hard and soft labels consistently yields better results. Crucially, we show that this gain cannot be explained by closer teacher matching during training. Instead, it comes from reduced exposure bias, the mismatch between training and inference distributions. To explain this phenomenon, we introduce the Bridge-Garden Decomposition theory, which categorizes generation steps into two types: Bridges, where the next token must be exact, and Gardens, where it can be flexible. We show that hard-only KD excels in Bridges by avoiding risky deviations, while soft-only KD preserves diversity in Gardens. A hybrid strategy handles both cases and, as a result, reduces exposure bias across the sequence. Guided by this theory, we develop a family of Bridge-Garden hybrid supervision methods that adaptively balance hard and soft labels. Across a primary suite of seven teacher-student pairs (including Qwen, Llama, Gemma, and DeepSeek) and benchmarks in reasoning and coding, our approach outperforms divergence-based and on-policy KD baselines while reducing training cost by 9.7x, enabling efficient model compression. Code is available at this https URL.
| Comments: | Accepted at ICML 2026 |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.26246 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.26246v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26246
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
GEM: Geometric Entropy Mixing for Optimal LLM Data Curation
May 27
-
The Constraint Tax: Measuring Validity-Correctness Tradeoffs in Structured Outputs for Small Language Models
May 27
-
AirCast-SR: A Foundation Model for Kilometer-Scale Atmospheric Super-Resolution via Latent Consistency Diffusion
May 27
-
SilIF: Silhouette-Augmented Isolation Forest for Unsupervised Transaction Fraud Detection
May 27
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.