On the Limits of Maximal Coding Rate Reduction for Out-of-Distribution Generalisation
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:On the Limits of Maximal Coding Rate Reduction for Out-of-Distribution Generalisation
Abstract:Substantial efforts have been devoted to making deep learning objectives, representations, and architectures interpretable, with the goal of improving the safety, robustness, and generalisation of learning systems in diverse real-world applications. The recently proposed maximal coding rate reduction ($\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$) offers a promising information-theoretic framework for learning structured, discriminative representations of class-wise submanifolds and has inspired interpretable white-box architectures. However, we observe that $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ can completely fail under distribution shift, motivating our study of its out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation limits. We establish two limitations of $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ for OOD generalisation. First, the $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ objective alone can admit complete prediction failure: a representation based entirely on unstable environmental features can achieve the global coding optimum yet fail completely after correlation reversal, despite an available perfectly stable feature. This exact-optimum example includes test inputs that cannot occur during training. Even when every possible test input can also occur during training, coding quality can be arbitrarily close to optimal while prediction error is arbitrarily close to 100%. Second, directly incorporating the invariance principle underlying widely successful invariant risk minimisation (IRM) and risk extrapolation (REx) does not eliminate this failure. The failing representation admits the same optimal coding operator across training environments, showing that shared coding optimality does not ensure stable prediction. Reliable OOD guarantees for $\mathrm{MCR}^{2}$ therefore require additional new assumptions or learning principles that establish stable predictive relationships across environments.
| Comments: | 31 pages, 8 figures, including appendices |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.21001 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.21001v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21001
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Stable and Faithful Explanations for Knowledge Tracing
Sep 25
-
SMILESGNN: Interpretable Clinical Toxicity Prediction via SMILES-Graph Cross-Attention Fusion
Sep 25
-
CFD Correction of Open Tip Clearance Flow in a Compressor Cascade Using VAE Latent Space Adaptation
Sep 25
-
CARE: Condition-Aware Representation Regularization for Diffusion Models
Sep 25
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.