arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning: Gradient-Based Client Identity Inference and Defenses for Inertial Sensing in Vehicular Edge Networks

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:2609.02971 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning: Gradient-Based Client Identity Inference and Defenses for Inertial Sensing in Vehicular Edge Networks

Authors:Ali Akarma (1 and 2), Toqeer Ali Syed (1), Muhammad Khan (3), Qurat-ul-ain Mastoi (3), Adeel Ahmad (1) ((1) Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia, (2) King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, (3) University of the West of England, Bristol, U.K.)
View a PDF of the paper titled Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning: Gradient-Based Client Identity Inference and Defenses for Inertial Sensing in Vehicular Edge Networks, by Ali Akarma (1 and 2) and 12 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:As vehicular networks move toward 5G/6G edge intelligence, federated learning (FL) is widely promoted as a privacy-preserving way for vehicles and infrastructure to train shared models without exposing raw sensor data. Yet the updates clients transmit still leak enough information to identify who sent them, which threatens the anonymity that safety-critical V2X applications assume and adds to existing concerns over adversarial ML, model poisoning, and backdoor attacks. We study server-side client identity inference from transmitted weight deltas using inertial (IMU) measurements, evaluated on the UCI Human Activity Recognition (HAR) benchmark as an accessible proxy for the IMU streams produced onboard connected vehicles. Across five attack classifiers and five non-IID partitions, an honest-but-curious server recovers client identity with near-perfect accuracy (approximately 1.000) from undefended updates, confirming a concrete identifiability risk. We then quantify the privacy-utility trade-off of a lightweight clip-then-noise defense by sweeping Gaussian noise (sigma in {0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, 1.00}) at fixed clipping (C=1.0), and report formal (epsilon, delta)-DP budgets through Renyi accounting. A practical region (sigma in [0.1, 0.2]) drives attack accuracy to near-random while costing under 5% relative FL accuracy. Ensemble FL supplies complementary structural privacy with a 1/K anonymity-set bound and no noise penalty. Results are supported by cryptographic (SHA-256) train/evaluation gradient disjointness, three seeds, and a count-normalized attacker-advantage metric. We position HAR explicitly as a proxy and discuss what validation on true vehicular telemetry would require.
Comments: Accepted for presentation at IEEE VTC2026-Fall, Boston, MA, USA, September 6-9, 2026
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.02971 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2609.02971v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02971
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ali Akarma [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:49:39 UTC (2,198 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning: Gradient-Based Client Identity Inference and Defenses for Inertial Sensing in Vehicular Edge Networks, by Ali Akarma (1 and 2) and 12 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CR
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning