arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Sensitivity Analysis of GRU, LSTM and Transformer Encoder in Classification of Automated Driving Systems

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.28665 (cs)
[Submitted on 25 Jul 2026]

Title:Sensitivity Analysis of GRU, LSTM and Transformer Encoder in Classification of Automated Driving Systems

View a PDF of the paper titled Sensitivity Analysis of GRU, LSTM and Transformer Encoder in Classification of Automated Driving Systems, by Bidhya Shrestha and Christos Papadopoulos
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Automated driving systems (ADSs) are becoming ubiquitous. Future Software Defined Vehicles (SDVs) may be able to run multiple ADSs, both native and aftermarket such as this http URL's Openpilot. Monitoring systems to independently verify which automated driving system is active are important for safety monitoring, regulatory compliance, insurance assessment, and anomaly detection. In this paper, we first evaluate the effectiveness of three sequence-based classification models: Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and a Transformer encoder model for identifying Level 2 automated driving systems using vehicle telematics data alone: Comma Openpilot, Tesla Autopilot, and Cadillac Super Cruise, along with manual driving. All three models achieve strong clean-data performance with macro F1-scores of 0.92 (GRU), 0.90 (LSTM), and 0.93 (Transformer encoder model) when trained on clean data; threat-matched training yields 0.904-0.916 macro F1 with only a modest clean-data penalty. Second, we introduce a modular robustness evaluation framework that simulates realistic telematics degradation through five corruption families at five severity levels (L1-L5). Continuous channels are perturbed using additive white Gaussian noise with cumulative drift, correlated cross-channel noise, and temporal jitter. Binary event signals are subjected to burst loss, delayed transitions, spurious toggles and cross-feature inconsistencies inspired by communication errors. Robustness is measured using macro-F1, which gives equal weight to each class and is suitable for imbalanced multiclass evaluation. Our evaluation reveals a sharp failure-mode split: event-level corruptions reduce macro-F1 only slightly (greater than equal to 0.87 at L5), while temporal jitter collapses macro-F1 to 0.44-0.50 across GRU, LSTM, and Transformer encoder model.
Comments: 7 pages, 6 figures, under review Milcom 2026
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.28665 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.28665v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28665
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Bidhya Shrestha [view email]
[v1] Sat, 25 Jul 2026 01:31:37 UTC (322 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Sensitivity Analysis of GRU, LSTM and Transformer Encoder in Classification of Automated Driving Systems, by Bidhya Shrestha and Christos Papadopoulos
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning