arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.28026 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Sep 2026]

Title:Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing, by Norah Almousa and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We investigate whether state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) generate feedback that reflects the pedagogical practices of expert teachers in terms of feedback focus and adaptivity. Previous evaluation efforts have examined feedback characteristics, its impact on learning, and its target, yet the focus of feedback and its adaptivity remains largely overlooked. To bridge this gap, we adopt and refine Narciss's taxonomy into seven feedback focus types to annotate teacher and LLM-generated feedback across three university writing courses. We release FeedType, a benchmark containing annotated teacher and LLM feedback from six LLMs under three prompting strategies. We assess the coverage and distribution of feedback focus types, and examine whether LLMs adapt their feedback across draft stages and student performance levels as an expert instructor does. Our findings show that while most LLMs cover most feedback focus types, they fail to reflect teacher feedback distributions and show varying levels of adaptivity, with none matching the teachers' adaptive behavior. We believe FeedType will support future research on pedagogical alignment in LLM feedback generation.
Comments: Accepted at AIME-Con 2026. Camera-ready version
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.28026 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.28026v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28026
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Norah Almousa [view email]
[v1] Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:51:08 UTC (616 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing, by Norah Almousa and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language