Can Terminal Agents Trust Their Own Verification? Diagnosing and Improving Self-Verification
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.38812 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026]
Title:Can Terminal Agents Trust Their Own Verification? Diagnosing and Improving Self-Verification
Authors:Yingfeng Luo, Shaowei Wei, Daixin Wang, Dingyang Lin, Kaiyan Chang, Weiqiao Shan, Tong Zheng, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jingbo Zhu, Tong Xiao
View a PDF of the paper titled Can Terminal Agents Trust Their Own Verification? Diagnosing and Improving Self-Verification, by Yingfeng Luo and 9 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Terminal agents rely on self-verification to assess and correct their solutions as they solve tasks through interaction with command-line environments. Yet how trustworthy such self-verification is remains poorly understood. To investigate this question systematically, we introduce a diagnostic framework that identifies the first complete solution in each trajectory, determines whether it is objectively correct, and uses this ground truth to quantify the agent's subsequent verification and recovery behavior. Applying it to ten terminal agents on TerminalBench2.1, we find that verification is nearly universal after a complete candidate is formed, yet only 61.43\% of incorrect candidates are detected and only 49.36\% of detected errors are successfully repaired. These results show that the main weakness in self-verification lies not in initiating verification, but in detecting and repairing errors. Motivated by these findings, we propose Student-Conditioned Verification Distillation (SCVD), which lets the student first produce a candidate solution and distills a stronger teacher's subsequent verification and recovery from the same interaction context. Across three Qwen3.5 backbones, SCVD improves \textsc{Pass@1} on TerminalBench2.1 by 9.74--16.85 percentage points over the corresponding base models and by 4.49--8.61 points over the standard full-trajectory distillation, while avoiding the pronounced out-of-distribution degradation of full-trajectory distillation on SWE-bench Verified.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.38812 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.38812v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38812
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Can Terminal Agents Trust Their Own Verification? Diagnosing and Improving Self-Verification, by Yingfeng Luo and 9 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Large Language Models are Approximate Survival Estimators
Oct 1
-
TomasuLLM: Out-of-Order Speculative Execution for LLM Agents
Oct 1
-
Automatic estimation of verbal fluency index in people with Motor Neuron Disease using ASR alignment and pause modelling
Oct 1
-
The System Prompt Illusion: How Instruction Preambles Modify Computation in Language Models
Oct 1
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.