When Both Layers Learn: Training Dynamics of Representing Linear Models via ReLU Networks
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:When Both Layers Learn: Training Dynamics of Representing Linear Models via ReLU Networks
Abstract:In this paper, we study the gradient descent dynamics for jointly training both layers of a one-hidden-layer ReLU network to fit a linear target function. Concretely, we consider a realizable setting where inputs are drawn i.i.d. from a Gaussian distribution and labels follow a planted linear model. This stylized framework captures salient features of end-to-end training in inverse problems and certain auto-encoder models. Despite its apparent simplicity, the dynamics remain poorly understood, in part because the loss landscape contains multiple non-strict saddle points, making it unclear why gradient descent from random initialization reliably escapes bad stationary regions. We provide a detailed characterization of the optimization landscape and prove that gradient descent from a moderately small random initialization-simultaneously training both layers-converges to a global minimizer at a linear rate with order-wise optimal sample complexity. Our analysis tracks the trajectory through three phases: an alignment phase in which hidden weights progressively align with the planted direction while the output weights maintain the correct sign pattern; a growth phase in which the norms of both layers increase while preserving alignment; and a local refinement phase in which the aligned neurons rapidly converge to the planted direction, yielding fast local convergence. To rigorously show that GD avoids non-strict saddles, we develop trajectory-level control arguments for the end-to-end dynamics. In addition, we establish novel uniform concentration results that hold along the entire trajectory, and are essential for obtaining order-wise optimal sample complexity. We corroborate our theory with extensive experiments across a range of configurations.
| Comments: | 47 pages, 8 figures, published at the 39th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT), 2026 |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.04476 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.04476v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04476
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Using Explainable Machine Learning on Clinical Biomarkers: A Multi-Class Classification Study Using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Dataset
Jun 4
-
Novel Aspects of IEEE SA P3109 Arithmetic Formats for Machine Learning
Jun 4
-
Position: Deployed Reinforcement Learning should be Continual
Jun 4
-
Pseudospectral Bounds for Transient Amplification in Coupled Gradient Descent
Jun 4
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.