Counterexamples as Feedback for Agent Self-Correction
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.02892 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]
Title:Counterexamples as Feedback for Agent Self-Correction
View a PDF of the paper titled Counterexamples as Feedback for Agent Self-Correction, by Sidhesh Badrinarayan and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Single-turn code-generation metrics understate a central property of deployed agents: whether they can repair a wrong artifact after receiving concrete feedback. This paper presents A-CEGIS, a lightweight framework that uses counterexamples as feedback for evaluating multi-turn refinement in natural-language-to-regex synthesis. An agent proposes a regex, a deterministic oracle checks it under full-match semantics, and compact false-positive or false-negative witnesses guide the next turn. On 30 NL-RX-Turk tasks, diagnostic counterexample feedback solves 90\% of tasks within a four-turn ablation budget, compared with 17% for zero-shot generation, 27% for generic self-correction, and 23% for error-only feedback. In a full diagnostic run with hardening, all tasks are solved on the hidden set by the final turn, with mean time-to-success of 2.7 turns and robust success of 77% after targeted probing. These results show that A-CEGIS measures how efficiently an agent improves across turns while adding a practical robustness check beyond the original held-out cases.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.02892 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.02892v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02892
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Adithya Parthasarathy [view email][v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 06:08:15 UTC (20 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Counterexamples as Feedback for Agent Self-Correction, by Sidhesh Badrinarayan and 1 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.