arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Good Rankers, Bad Objectives: Bilinear Contrastive Critics under Expressive Policy Search

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.27422 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Jul 2026]

Title:Good Rankers, Bad Objectives: Bilinear Contrastive Critics under Expressive Policy Search

View a PDF of the paper titled Good Rankers, Bad Objectives: Bilinear Contrastive Critics under Expressive Policy Search, by Ayushman Singh and Siddharth Aphale
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Good action rankings do not make a contrastive critic safe to maximize. These critics increasingly act as value-like objectives for best-of-$K$ selection, planning, and critic-guided generation. Unbounded bilinear scores can let large embedding norms inflate off-support values, but cosine bounding does not remove the failure. A controlled support decomposition attributes most raw bilinear regret to norm drift. Cosine and hybrid critics nevertheless select off-support actions from most pools and incur comparable regret. Contrastive scores are weakly calibrated or inverted in the top score decile across four OGBench navigation tasks, and they fail to order fixed-query actions by value. Bellman-trained TD-Q succeeds, including in a parameter-matched function-class control. Realized costs depend on the task: simulator rollouts reveal single-step selection costs on PointMaze and the exact-$Q^*$ toy but well-powered nulls on AntMaze and HumanoidMaze, where the controller can self-correct. A training/readout decomposition traces the lost ordering to the cosine training objective; raw-trained embeddings retain weak ordering after inference-time normalization. Candidate maximization can therefore exploit false positives caused by norm drift, score saturation, or in-support misranking. Contrastive critics remain useful compatibility rankers on navigation and manipulation tasks, but action selection requires a value-calibrated scalar.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.27422 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.27422v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27422
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ayushman Singh [view email]
[v1] Wed, 29 Jul 2026 19:43:40 UTC (1,619 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Good Rankers, Bad Objectives: Bilinear Contrastive Critics under Expressive Policy Search, by Ayushman Singh and Siddharth Aphale
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning