Exact equivariance, kept through training, buys zero-shot generalisation across the symmetry group
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Exact equivariance, kept through training, buys zero-shot generalisation across the symmetry group
Abstract:A latent world model built from an equivariant encoder $E$ and an equivariant predictor $f$ inherits a provable symmetry of its training loss: when the world's dynamics genuinely carries a group $G$ acting on latents by an orthogonal representation $\rho(g)$, the one-step prediction relMSE is exactly invariant across the whole group, so fitting the dynamics on a restricted slice of orientations mathematically determines it on the entire orbit (jǔ yī fǎn sān). We verify this end-to-end at laptop scale (CPU/MPS, fully seeded). [A] The symmetry survives a real Muon/AdamW + EMA + VICReg run -- composed encode-then-predict residual $\sim 10^{-6}$ after optimisation, not just at initialisation, and under any optimiser. [B] One-step error is flat to five digits across the group, while a same-hypothesis-class non-equivariant baseline fits the slice but breaks out-of-distribution (VN $\times 1.00$ vs baseline $\times 13.8$ in 2D, $\times 17.2$ in 3D, $\times 157$ over the full $\mathrm{SE}(3)$ ladder), with the equivariant model $4.5$-$7.4\times$ smaller. [C] The same isometry argument lifts to closed loop: under a matching equivariant planner the control trajectory at orientation $g$ is exactly $\rho(g)$ applied to the seen one, so closed-loop error is invariant across the group -- float-floor-exact in 2D/$\mathrm{SO}(2)$ on real PushT and statistically flat in 3D/$\mathrm{SE}(3)$ (disjoint 95% CIs). We stress-test the prior against Sutton's Bitter Lesson: augmentation, brute-force scale, and soft-equivariance each close at most the across-group task metric, never the float-floor exactness. Because equivariance is closed under composition, the $H$-fold rollout stays flat ($\times 1.00$, $\le 2\times 10^{-7}$) at every horizon, while the baseline's residual compounds with $H$. Out of scope: task-success sweeps, planner-free invariance, and scaling.
| Comments: | 92 pages, 11 figures. Core paper plus an extended results-log appendix and a forward-looking theory supplement. All experiments are laptop-scale (CPU/MPS), fully seeded and deterministic |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO) |
| MSC classes: | 68T07, 68T05, 22E70 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.03003 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.03003v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03003
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Human-in-the-Loop Contextual Bandits for Short-Term Rental Dynamic Pricing: Structural Equivalence of Historical Warm-Up and Approval-Gated Live Learning
Jun 3
-
Spectral Asymptotics of Neural Network Loss Landscapes: An Exact Decomposition of the Curvature Exponent
Jun 3
-
Making Brain-Computer Interfaces More Secure
Jun 3
-
Assessing Region-Level EEG Contributions to Cognitive Workload Prediction
Jun 3
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.