arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.22221 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning

View a PDF of the paper titled Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning, by Antonela Tommasel and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent and coherent text that is increasingly difficult to distinguish from human writing, motivating the development of automatic AI-generated text detectors. However, the robustness of such detectors under adversarial generation remains uncertain. This paper presents SHADE (Stochastic Human-like generation via Adversarial Detector Evasion), a reinforcement learning framework that formulates detector evasion as a policy optimization problem. Instead of applying post-hoc perturbations or prompting-based rewriting, SHADE fine-tunes an instruction-tuned LLaMA model with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), using feedback from a surrogate detector based on the PAN 2025 mdok system. Our experiments show that full fine-tuning with a small KL regularization penalty achieves $98.5\%$ surrogate evasion, compared to $1.5\%$ for the base model, while LoRA-based adaptation is substantially less effective under regularization. Linguistic analysis reveals that successful evasion is associated with shorter, simpler, and less lexically diverse outputs, suggesting that high detector evasion does not necessarily correspond to more human-like writing. In the official Voight-Kampff competition setting, our submissions ranked sixth and seventh, indicating that optimization against a single surrogate detector only partially transfers to unseen evaluation classifiers. These results highlight both the potential and limitations of reinforcement learning for adversarial AI-text generation and motivate more robust, multi-detector evaluation protocols for AI-generated text detection.
Comments: Accepted for Working Notes of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2026)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.22221 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.22221v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22221
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Juan Manuel Rodriguez [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:26:10 UTC (156 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning, by Antonela Tommasel and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language