Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Team DArgk at the 2026 ELOQUENT lab for evaluating generative language model quality: Residuals of Humanity: AI Detection Evasion via GRPO Fine-Tuning
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent and coherent text that is increasingly difficult to distinguish from human writing, motivating the development of automatic AI-generated text detectors. However, the robustness of such detectors under adversarial generation remains uncertain. This paper presents SHADE (Stochastic Human-like generation via Adversarial Detector Evasion), a reinforcement learning framework that formulates detector evasion as a policy optimization problem. Instead of applying post-hoc perturbations or prompting-based rewriting, SHADE fine-tunes an instruction-tuned LLaMA model with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), using feedback from a surrogate detector based on the PAN 2025 mdok system. Our experiments show that full fine-tuning with a small KL regularization penalty achieves $98.5\%$ surrogate evasion, compared to $1.5\%$ for the base model, while LoRA-based adaptation is substantially less effective under regularization. Linguistic analysis reveals that successful evasion is associated with shorter, simpler, and less lexically diverse outputs, suggesting that high detector evasion does not necessarily correspond to more human-like writing. In the official Voight-Kampff competition setting, our submissions ranked sixth and seventh, indicating that optimization against a single surrogate detector only partially transfers to unseen evaluation classifiers. These results highlight both the potential and limitations of reinforcement learning for adversarial AI-text generation and motivate more robust, multi-detector evaluation protocols for AI-generated text detection.
| Comments: | Accepted for Working Notes of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2026) |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.22221 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.22221v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22221
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Juan Manuel Rodriguez [view email][v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:26:10 UTC (156 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
A Mechanistic Study of AI-Text Detection Neurons in Frozen BERT: Sparse Probing and Activation Patching on RAID
Sep 28
-
Manifold Projection and Iterative Autoencoder Refinement for Masked Language Modeling
Sep 28
-
Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents
Sep 28
-
Auditing and Repairing LLM-as-Judge Failures in a Production Text-to-SQL Pipeline
Sep 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.