EACL Reviewers no response [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
The rebuttal is still ongoing so this could also change, but my reviewers have not responded back to my responses yet. I know they have the right not to reply. One of the reviewers gave a 2 with a 5 confidence and the whole review is actually one of the many limitation I included in the paper. Limitations are not to be used as a weakness according to the conference own rules. The other two reviews are 3,4 which I am happy with although I did address their points. Should I send a confidential message to AC if nothing happens in 2 days?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Talus: a 23M-parameter diffusion model for game terrain, evaluated against a real-vs-real noise floor, running in the browser on WebGPU [P]
Oct 9
-
Integrum - Reflection based MCP server from any Python Module/Library [P]
Oct 9
-
Clarification ARR Commitment [D]
Oct 9
-
I built ALHR: A tree based sparse attention system that achieves sub-quadratic inference while retaining accuracy. [P]
Oct 9
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.