arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Same Target, Different Basins: Hard vs. Soft Labels for Annotator Distributions

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2605.20642 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 May 2026]

Title:Same Target, Different Basins: Hard vs. Soft Labels for Annotator Distributions

View a PDF of the paper titled Same Target, Different Basins: Hard vs. Soft Labels for Annotator Distributions, by Mirerfan Gheibi and Gashin Ghazizadeh
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:When annotators disagree, that disagreement can reflect epistemic uncertainty rather than simple label noise. We study hard-label delivery as an alternative to the usual choices of collapsing votes to a single label or training directly on the empirical soft-label distribution. We focus on two primary hard-label methods: multipass, which cycles through observed votes while keeping the dataset size fixed, and stochastic label sampling (SLS), which samples one label per example at the start of each epoch. On CIFAR-10H, we find that when only a small number of annotations per example is available, hard-label delivery improves over soft-label training, with larger improvements where the sparse empirical target is farther from the full annotator distribution. When full annotator distributions are available, both hard-label methods match soft-label training. We use deterministic control as an ablation of multipass and shuffled SLS as a control that breaks the example-to-distribution match. We also show that SLS and soft-label cross-entropy optimize the same expected objective. Hard-label delivery also converges to flatter basins, with supporting descriptive evidence from OOD detection on SVHN and CIFAR-100. Overall, these results suggest that multipass is a strong practical default when raw vote counts are available, while SLS offers a lightweight alternative that remains competitive when only a few votes per example are available and matches soft-label training when full annotator distributions are available.
Comments: 14 pages, 12 figures. Accepted to the 2nd Workshop on Epistemic Intelligence in Machine Learning (EIML @ ICML 2026)
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.20642 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2605.20642v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20642
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mirerfan Gheibi [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 May 2026 03:02:20 UTC (943 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Same Target, Different Basins: Hard vs. Soft Labels for Annotator Distributions, by Mirerfan Gheibi and Gashin Ghazizadeh
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning