EACL 2027: Author response and author-reviewer discussion are now two separate stages and allow more time [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
EACL 2027 just published their CFP which contains an important change to the common ARR process:
For this cycle, author response and author-reviewer discussion are two separate stages
Looking at the deadlines, they not only split the process but also allow more time:
- Author response period Sept 14-19, 2026
- Reviewer engagement and Author-reviewer discussion Sept 20-24, 2026
Previously, ARR cycles only gave five days in total for the discussion period. ARR May 2026, for example, only gives July 7 to July 13 for the total authors-reviewer discussion (no separate author response period).
In summary, that means not only that the process is being split in two stages but you now also have more time.
---
In my opinion this is really good as in the past having just 5 days to post a reply (potentially involving new experiments - even though that is not the original idea of the discussion period) and getting into a discussion with the reviewers felt very tight - for authors and reviewers. I am, therefore, really looking forward to this change.
Any thoughts?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Loss functions in Instance Representation Learning [R]
Jun 29
-
Price elasticity model [R]
Jun 29
-
Rejected MICCAI paper: workshop -> journal/conference or directly journal/conference [R]
Jun 29
-
I built a demo agricultural planning system with an AI advisor for small-scale farmers in Nicaragua using NASA data [p]
Jun 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.