arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Reliability-Centered Evaluation of Sparse Longitudinal CT Lesion-Size Forecasting with Conformal Interval Calibration and Gompertz-Inspired Regularization

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.21197 (cs)
[Submitted on 18 Sep 2026]

Title:Reliability-Centered Evaluation of Sparse Longitudinal CT Lesion-Size Forecasting with Conformal Interval Calibration and Gompertz-Inspired Regularization

Authors:Lingfei Kong
View a PDF of the paper titled Reliability-Centered Evaluation of Sparse Longitudinal CT Lesion-Size Forecasting with Conformal Interval Calibration and Gompertz-Inspired Regularization, by Lingfei Kong
View PDF
Abstract:Sparse longitudinal CT follow-up limits lesion-size forecasting when only a few prior observations are available. We constructed a five-visit DLT-derived same-lesion trajectory benchmark from DeepLesion and Deep Lesion Tracker (DLT), yielding 205 trajectories from 129 patients. We compared an exploratory conventional sparse-to-final analysis with a primary fixed visit-index horizon design predicting the common log change from T3 to T4 while progressively adding earlier observations, evaluating predictive accuracy, uncertainty reliability, post-hoc conformal interval calibration, subgroup performance, and Gompertz-inspired trajectory regularization. The evaluated methods showed partially overlapping point-prediction accuracy but distinct uncertainty behavior. Mean held-out RMSE across ten training seeds was 0.4726, 0.4305, 0.4499, and 0.4513 for m = 1, 2, 3, 4, indicating the lowest mean RMSE at m = 2; additional history did not improve RMSE. At m = 4, raw Cohort-Level Feature GP coverage was near the 95% nominal level, whereas MC Dropout, Deep Ensemble, and residual-scale intervals were conservative. Patient-level conformal calibration generally produced near-nominal or conservative coverage at the cost of wider intervals. Patient-grouped development cross-validation selected lambda* = 0 for the Gompertz-inspired term. A global population reference frequently opposed lesion-level change directions, and prediction difficulty varied across anatomical subgroups. Overall, additional historical observations provided limited predictive benefit once the prediction horizon was controlled, while predictive accuracy, uncertainty reliability, and trajectory consistency did not necessarily improve together, and should be evaluated jointly in sparse longitudinal imaging.
Comments: 25 pages, 11 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.21197 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.21197v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21197
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Lingfei Kong [view email]
[v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 01:25:48 UTC (459 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Reliability-Centered Evaluation of Sparse Longitudinal CT Lesion-Size Forecasting with Conformal Interval Calibration and Gompertz-Inspired Regularization, by Lingfei Kong
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning