arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Phonemizing User-Generated Text: A Benchmark, Taxonomy, and Compositional Approach

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.27205 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Sep 2026]

Title:Phonemizing User-Generated Text: A Benchmark, Taxonomy, and Compositional Approach

View a PDF of the paper titled Phonemizing User-Generated Text: A Benchmark, Taxonomy, and Compositional Approach, by MinJu Jeon and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Text-to-speech systems increasingly process user-generated text (UGT) such as ppl and imo, whose pronunciation must be inferred from the canonical rather than surface form. We introduce UGTPhon, the first grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) benchmark for UGT in English, Vietnamese, and Korean, together with an inference-grounded taxonomy for fine-grained diagnosis. Existing G2P models and frontier LLMs exhibit a systematic canonical-to-non-canonical performance gap, reaching up to 66.8 PER points. As a benchmark baseline, we propose a simple compositional G2P approach that incorporates canonical-form evidence through exact-match lookup and staged decoding. Across matched ByT5 and Qwen2.5-0.5B backbones, explicit canonical-form modeling consistently reduces non-canonical G2P errors. The 0.5B variant also performs competitively with much larger few-shot frontier LLMs, highlighting the benefit of explicitly modeling canonical-form inference for UGT phonemization.
Comments: Accepted in EMNLP 2026 Findings
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.27205 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.27205v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27205
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Minju Jeon [view email]
[v1] Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:12:04 UTC (354 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language