arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Mitigating LLM Over-Refusal via Dynamic Semantic Routing Calibratione

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.25049 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Sep 2026]

Title:Mitigating LLM Over-Refusal via Dynamic Semantic Routing Calibratione

View a PDF of the paper titled Mitigating LLM Over-Refusal via Dynamic Semantic Routing Calibratione, by Zixuan Wang and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) aligned for safety often suffer from over-refusal, incorrectly rejecting benign yet safety-related instructions. Prior studies primarily attribute this to static representation overlap, largely overlooking the underlying dynamic mechanisms. In this paper, we present the mechanistic analysis of over-refusal through the lens of internal routing conflicts within transformer attention. We discover that a sparse subset of Hypersensitive Safety Heads misfires on Hard-Safe prompts, exhibiting abnormal attention entanglement that forcefully binds harmless target entities to refusal semantics. This triggers a severe, high-entropy routing conflict that deprives target entities of necessary attention. To counteract this, we propose Semantic Routing Calibration (SRC), a lightweight, training-free inference framework. SRC precisely localizes and dynamically suppresses these hypersensitive safety heads at the inference stage. Coupled with a dual-branch logits fusion that acts as a safety regularizer during subsequent decoding, SRC seamlessly restores trustworthy reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SRC alleviates over-refusal, with intrinsic safety performance preserved as much as feasible.
Comments: 33 pages, 13 figures, accepted to the EMNLP 2026 Main Conference
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.25049 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.25049v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25049
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zixuan Wang [view email]
[v1] Sun, 6 Sep 2026 09:37:56 UTC (10,075 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language