From Confident Closing to Silent Failure: Characterizing False Success in LLM Agents
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:From Confident Closing to Silent Failure: Characterizing False Success in LLM Agents
Abstract:LLM agents can fail silently by asserting task completion when the environment state shows otherwise. We study this failure mode, false success, across two agent benchmarks: 9,876 tau2-bench trajectories from 8 model families and 1,879 AppWorld trajectories from 4 model families with text-independent ground truth. False success is common but varies by setting: 45--48% of failures in single-control tau2-bench domains, 3% in dual-control telecom, and 75.8% among AppWorld self-assessing coding-agent trajectories with explicit status claims. LLM judges fail reliably: no configuration across 5 judges, 5 prompt strategies, and full task specifications exceeds AUROC 0.65 on tau2-bench, and the same judges reach only 0.54 AUROC on AppWorld API-call traces. Judges rely on surface completion proxies -- confident closing language in tau2-bench and coarse action-sequence volume in AppWorld -- rather than verified state changes. Lightweight TF-IDF detectors achieve task-disjoint AUROC 0.83 on tau2-bench and 0.95 on AppWorld, recovering 4--8x more false successes than the best judge at the same flag rate with 3,300x lower latency. These results suggest that production monitoring should use lightweight, domain-calibrated detectors as triage signals rather than relying on LLM judges as the primary monitor for false success.
| Comments: | Accepted to FAGEN@ICML2026 |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.09863 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.09863v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.09863
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Restless bandits with imperfect binary feedback: PCL-indexability analysis and computation
Jun 11
-
Few-Shot Resampling for Scalable Statistically-Sound Data Mining
Jun 11
-
Physics-informed generative AI for semiconductor manufacturing: Enforcing hard physical constraints in generative models by construction
Jun 11
-
Mechanical Field Networks: Structured Neural Dynamics for Multivariate Systems
Jun 11
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.