How exactly does the NeurIPS meta reviewer response work? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
We can currently answer the meta-reviewer via AC confidential comment, but they just posted the following tweet:
https://x.com/neuripsconf/status/2081991451236319328?s=46&t=HWfJoLgHxGH2W5l-o3mPJw
Where it says:
“Please post your answers to the Area Chair's initial-meta reviews via a comment from July 28th and by August 3rd, so that reviewers can see it too.”
Is this option going to open up today as the rebuttal period ends? Is this where the meta-reviewer rebuttal should be posted? Or are we supposed to finalize the discussions and inform the AC at the end, stating what happened basically? It is all quite confusing.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
When associative memory fails, are the synapses degraded? I measured them directly — they aren't. [R]
Aug 11
-
fru - Fast Random Forest Implementation [P]
Aug 10
-
Transformers are famously bad at arithmetic, so I set one's weights by hand (no training) and it multiplies with 100% accuracy [P]
Aug 10
-
How to file a complaint about a published CVPR paper? [R]
Aug 10
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.