How exactly does the NeurIPS meta reviewer response work? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
We can currently answer the meta-reviewer via AC confidential comment, but they just posted the following tweet:
https://x.com/neuripsconf/status/2081991451236319328?s=46&t=HWfJoLgHxGH2W5l-o3mPJw
Where it says:
“Please post your answers to the Area Chair's initial-meta reviews via a comment from July 28th and by August 3rd, so that reviewers can see it too.”
Is this option going to open up today as the rebuttal period ends? Is this where the meta-reviewer rebuttal should be posted? Or are we supposed to finalize the discussions and inform the AC at the end, stating what happened basically? It is all quite confusing.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.