arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Reporting Under Pressure: Separating Factual and Tonal Sycophancy in LLM Statistical Analysis

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2609.27756 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Aug 2026]

Title:Reporting Under Pressure: Separating Factual and Tonal Sycophancy in LLM Statistical Analysis

View a PDF of the paper titled Reporting Under Pressure: Separating Factual and Tonal Sycophancy in LLM Statistical Analysis, by Paras Balani and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly asked to analyze data and report what the results mean, a task distinct from the belief- or preference-alignment settings studied in most sycophancy research. We test whether editorial framing in the prompt, ranging from a neutral request to an explicit instruction to search exhaustively for reasons to discredit or to support a finding, changes not just the tone but the substance of a model's report. Across a 4 x 4 factorial design crossing four framing conditions with four ground-truth data patterns (a genuine effect, a confound that mimics an effect but fails a robustness check, a well-powered null, and an underpowered null), we collect 480 responses and score each along two independent dimensions: whether its factual claim about the data diverged from the correct interpretation, and whether only its tone diverged while the claim stayed correct. Factual misrepresentation is concentrated in two cells: brutally critical framing applied to a genuine effect, where the model talks itself into unwarranted skepticism (97% of responses), and significance-seeking framing applied to an underpowered null, where the model overstates confidence in a null conclusion the data cannot support (100% of responses). Tone shifts far more broadly than factual content does, with critical framing producing a defensive, hedge-heavy register across every data pattern regardless of what the data show, while significance-seeking framing shifts tone only where the data leave genuine ambiguity. A confound present in the data itself blocks both kinds of shift almost entirely under every framing condition tested. These results indicate that the risk of framing-induced distortion in LLM-assisted data analysis is neither uniform across framings nor uniform across data patterns, and that a model can hold a correct conclusion in place while its tone shifts substantially around it.
Comments: 9 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.27756 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2609.27756v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27756
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Paras Balani [view email]
[v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:41:37 UTC (61 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Reporting Under Pressure: Separating Factual and Tonal Sycophancy in LLM Statistical Analysis, by Paras Balani and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language